Attempting to find black-hole financing for a reason that appears, at least to them, to have for sure of issues to “explore”, EHHI, a widely funded New Haven, COMPUTERTOMOGRAFIE based environmental research group, demands a moratorium on building new local manufactured turf fields and gets a commitment for one hundred dollar, 000 more in financial support, from the Connecticut Attorney General’s office, to continue their studies.
Somewhat than funding, AG may have solution to the problem! how long does fake grass last
Creating confusion and leveraging fear in parents’ minds for their children and heartland’s well-being, an impassioned environmental group appeared this summer with a mission. Their efforts have cost local communities hundreds of dollars in financing and consulting fees, holdups hindrances impediments in the construction of recent sport fields, organic nerves and strained associations. The web result of this group’s efforts, so considerably, are inconclusive test results and an independent, to some extent self-serving report that provided no new information or answers other than “more study is needed” about the difficulties they themselves acquired raised.
Crumb Rubber Infill is the new smoking gun some want to put a security freeze on and throw in the closet. The general opinion of industry professionals and east coast locals looks to lean towards understanding a tiny selection of citizens’ grass-roots efforts as a mere “smoke screen”, clouding the real issue of how public demands for activities field play areas in schools and parks are out-stripping resources available also to spite the clear need of the community and interests of everybody to look at alternatives to natural grass play areas, this group wants to filibuster the decision to make the needed investment by building a circumstance against it; in result adding additional hidden costs to the process; challenging public and private cash.
Every published safety record; in addition to hundreds that contain recently been done over the years; has plainly explained that no over-whelming evidence is present that would imply our overall health or environment is at risk using artificial turf and crumb rubber infill as surface materials for play fields, lawns and leisure sports venues.
To get every article written about the “hazards” of the crumb rubber infill that top-dresses artificial turf areas, providing resiliency and AND ALSO protection for the cutting blades, there are 20 more stories proudly describing many years of faithful service, lowered maintenance costs & water use, of water districts granting endorsements for the use of artificial turf in the form of refunds and of the notices of the funding of new artificial turf land for public use, for hundreds of thousands of people, all over the world. See Current Man-made Turf Rebates Index and Industry News and Situations at ASGi.
Public Daily activities – Private Funding
With no publicly disclosing plans for her “toxic-free” maintenance routine for natural field alternatives her group promotes while continuing to pursue protecting additional funding for even more studies of the “possible hazards” of crumb rubber infill in artificial turf domains her group wants to stop from being built seems duplicitous of Nancy Alderman, spokesperson and director of EHHI, Environment & Human Health, Inc.; the recipient, so far, of $2000 in grant funds for “studying” the possible environmental and human health issues of the use of recycled crumb plastic infill.
The initial grants was invested in an one month study conducted by EHHI. Their record yielded no new data and merely explained the obvious, that there was no “smoking guns” found; with the added caveat that something could have recently been missed in their evaluation and the situation would require more time and additional funding for continuing study.
Existing Published Analyses from Reputable, Recognized Resources
The wealth of existing studies published by internationally known, reputable scientific and collegiate sources seems to elude EHHI researchers. A current set of published technological, independent studies is located, online at ASGi Environmental Impact Studies Index Web pages. Artificial turf has recently been used extensively in sports activities venues for over 45 years; crumbed rubber infill was added to the program in late 1980s; this is not new technology or engineering; 2 several weeks. healthy, stabile, growing market with sustainable products. Crumbed rubber is also widely used in the appearing of natural grass areas, to help extend their life and increase their strength and resiliency.
EHHI – Okay to Work with Known (but Regulated) Dangerous Fertilizers, Pesticides and Various other Chemicals on Proposed Herbal Turf Field
The overseer of toxicology for EHHI, David R. Brown, quickly admits, in a recent article from TireReview. por, that fertilizers, insect sprays and other chemicals are going to be used on their proposed natural turf field for Fairfield Country Day School located within short distance of an environmentally sensitive lake & estuary, Nevertheless , says Brown; “agricultural chemicals are tested, accredited and managed. Grass turf does not have any shocks, whereas crumb rubber might. ”
Brown side-steps any mention of the risks to children and local watershed to exposure to the very toxins EHHI was chartered to remove from local schools years ago! At time of publishing, EHHI have not yet publicly published any data comparing the environmental and cost impact of their natural turf solution to that of artificial grass. One would wonder if it may not show that for each and every “possible” toxin related to crumb rubber there isn’t one, equally as difficult to approve, using “regulated and approved” yard care solutions.